Assertion, Denial, Accepting, Rejecting, Symmetry & Paradox
نویسنده
چکیده
Proponents of “truth-value glut” responses to the paradoxes of selfreference, such as Priest [7, 8] argue that “truth-value gap” analyses of the paradoxes fall foul of the strengthened liar paradox: “this sentence is not true.” If we pay attention to the role of assertion and denial and the behaviour of negation in both “gap” and “glut” analyses, we see that the situation with these approaches has a pleasing symmetry: gap approaches take some denials to fail to be expressible by negation, and glut approaches take some negations to not express denials. But in the light of this symmetry, considerations against a gap view point to parallel considerations against a glut view. Those who find some reason to prefer one view over another (and this is almost everyone) must find some reason to break this symmetry.
منابع مشابه
The Communication Between Congestion and Accepting or Rejecting Outliers Units; An Application of DEA
متن کامل
On the Strict Tolerant Conception of Truth
We discuss four distinct semantic consequence relations which are based on Strong Kleene theories of truth and which generalize the notion of classical consequence to 3-valued logics. Then we set up a uniform signed tableau calculus (the strict-tolerant calculus) which we show to be sound and complete with respect to each of the four semantic consequence relations. The signs employed by our cal...
متن کاملWilliamson on Wittgenstein’s “Family Resemblances” and the Sorites Paradox
In a short section of his book Vagueness, Timothy Williamson attempts to resolve a paradox regarding the expansion of Wittgenstein’s ‘family resemblance’ concepts, as they are described in his Philosophical Investigations Williamson contends that certain ‘family resemblance’ concepts such as “game” seem to have the capability to expand through a network of resemblances to become applicable to e...
متن کاملDefinitional Reasoning in Proof-Theoretic Semantics and the Square of Opposition
Within a framework of reasoning with respect to clausal definitions of atoms, four forms of judgement are distinguished: Direct and indirect assertion, and direct and indirect denial. Whereas direct assertion and direct denial are established by directly applying a definitional clause (“definitional closure”), indirect assertion and indirect denial result from showing that all possible premisse...
متن کاملحجیت سنت از دیدگاه محمود ابوریه
One of the people whose views on tradition caused much controversy is Mahmood Abu Riyyah. In his book Adhwaala al-Sunnah al-Muhammadiyyah he discusses certain issues which could not be acceptable to the Sunni students of hadith and, therefore, they accused him of opposing tradition. In contrast, his views on the Sunni circles of hadith have been greatly welcomed in the Shiite world, especiall...
متن کامل